Read the following papers: Brenner, Susan W., and Bert-Jaap Koops. “Approaches t
the following papers:
Susan W., and Bert-Jaap Koops. “Approaches to cybercrime
jurisdiction.” J. High Tech. L. 4
(2004): (PDF) Approaches to Cybercrime Jurisdiction (researchgate.net)
Joel R., et al. “Internet Jurisdiction:
A survey of legal scholarship published in English and United States Case
Law.” (2013): Technology and Internet Jurisdiction (upenn.edu)
California Cable Laws: California Cable Laws – CCTA (calcable.org)
the following questions:
Currently, there are questions over whether it is permissible for
ISP’s (major U.S. providers include Comcast, Verizon and AT & T) to
control aspects of speed and delivery of content on their networks to
their subscribers. Many subscribers and sites have complained about these
practices, asserting that the ISPs should handle all content the same.
What organization or governmental entity should handle this? How should it
Discuss the impact of California Laws over ISP traffic content
regarding the above cases.
Discuss the approaches to Internet jurisdiction based on laws
of different countries.
250 Words or more.