Write a two-page paper analyzing the fact pattern presented below using federal

Write a two-page paper analyzing the fact pattern presented below
using federal law. Your analysis should include application of the topics such
as: search and seizures, search warrants, execution of warrants,
exceptions to the warrant requirement, exclusionary rule, Miranda rights, and
the right against self-incrimination. Do not restate the facts in your
paper, but rather identify the issues, analyze, and provide legal reasoning. Ensure citations are in
APA
Chris
is a police officer with the local Centerville Police Department. She is
in plain clothes and knocked on the front door of Steve’s house and asked
if she could enter to enforce a valid warrant. The warrant was a search
warrant issued by Judge Wells from the Centerville District Court. Judge
Wells is a retired state police trooper from the state police barracks in
Centerville. The warrant indicated that “the first floor of Steve’s
house will be searched for a gun used in connection with a robbery and jewelry,
which was stolen.” While searching the first floor of Steve’s house,
Officer Chris smelled what she thought was gun powder emanating from the second
floor. Officer Chris immediately walked upstairs and found a gun at the
tops of the stairs. She went to confiscate the gun and while doing so
noticed a note attached to the gun with an address on it. The address was
a known location for stolen jewelry to be pawned. During the search,
Steve told Officer Chris that, “I do not know what you are here for,
because I did not rob Grubb’s jewelry store.” Officer Chris asked
Steve to go to the police station and Steve agreed. As they walked into
the police station, Judge Wells yelled, “is that the person who robbed
Grubb’s jewelry store?” Steve replied, “I told Officer Chris
already, I did not rob Grubb’s jewelry store.”